Posted By Isaac Stone Fish Share

The agreement announced yesterday between the United States and North Korea has been greeted with both cheers and jeers. Optimists see this latest development as a small, necessary first step on the path toward a Korean peninsula free of nuclear weapons -- and this, for a relatively modest amount of aid. Pessimists see it as just more of the same -- yet another ploy by a corrupt, failed and cynical North Korean leadership making meaningless commitments in exchange for badly needed food.

Here is a guest post from Philip Yun, executive director of the Ploughshares Fund and a former advisor to the State Department during talks with North Korea from 1998-2001. Yun sees the significance of the agreement in the surprisingly number of differences in the statements issued by the United States and the DPRK.

Normally, the U.S. State Department announcement and the DPRK Foreign Ministry statement should be almost the same, as language and details are typically coordinated before final announcements are made. The two documents' striking discrepancies and omissions in significant places making me wonder if a "meeting of the minds" actually took place: 

"While productive dialogues continue." The DPRK agreed to a moratorium on nuclear tests, long-range missile activity, and uranium enrichment activity at their main reactor site in Yongbyon, as well as IAEA monitoring of uranium enrichment activities "while productive dialogues continue."  The U.S. statement makes no mention of this qualifier.  Did North Korea just add this unilaterally? 

No starting date. The three moratoriums are potentially significant because they concretely limit North Korea's ability (for as long as the moratorium is in place) to produce more fissile material, improve its weapons design through miniaturization and refine its weapons delivery systems. In exchange, the United States agreed to provide 240,000 metric tons of nutritional biscuits.  But when do the moratoriums take place?   And how will the food be delivered and under what conditions?  The U.S. statement specifically refers to "intensive monitoring" of this aid, but the DPRK statement bears no mention of such monitoring.

What about the other facilities? Many experts believe that North Korea has uranium enrichment facilities in other locales, but an initial reading of the statements appears to apply the moratorium to Yongbyon only. Were there any understandings for other locations?  If limited to Yongbyon (which is start, but access to other sites inevitably remains a major issue for both the United States and the North), when will the IAEA go to Yongbyon and under what conditions?

What about that light water reactor? The DPRK statement raises the issue of light water reactors (LWRs).  The State Department's version doesn't mention LWRs. The DRPK has been persistent through the years about its demand and right to have an operational LWR, which the United States since 2003 has resisted or ignored -- LWRs were central to the U.S.-DPRK nuclear deal of 1994 and a significant sticking point in negotiations of September 2005 Joint Statement. Does this new agreement require North Korea to stop its ongoing construction of a light water reactor at Yongbyon, which according to the North, is for the production of electricity?  Last year at Fukushima we saw what can happen to a nuclear plant built with the best materials and to the highest standards. Yongbyon is being constructed with far lower standards: a similar disaster would be dire.

Will there be a peace treaty?  Both statements contain a reference to the 1953 Armistice Agreement.  The State Department and DPRK versions both say that they recognized the Armistice as "the cornerstone of peace and stability;" but the DPRK added, "until the conclusion of a peace treaty."  The subject of a peace treaty and its impact has posed a whole series of long-standing issues military, legal and otherwise. This difference just adds to the overall need to clarify what exactly was agreed to between the United States and the DPRK.

This latest news could be a very good sign that North Korea's leadership is willing to make commitments.  So long as China continues to shield North Korea as it has, a concerted, sustained and focused diplomatic push with North Korea appears to be the only way to move forward. Having IAEA inspectors on the ground in North Korea would especially be extremely useful -- rather than speculating about North Korean activity and relying on rumor, we would have something more concrete to consider.   However, if progress is to be made, we have to avoid unpleasant surprises. The U.S. must figure out a way to patch the holes that still seem to exist between the two negotiating parties or this latest development may once again set expectations too high. In short, the devil is in the details - and we had better find out quickly what they are.  

 

KINZA ALI

2:17 PM ET

March 4, 2012

good

Kim Jong Il's funeral on Wednesday was the latest spectacle in a regime well-versed in totalitarian theater. The death of the Dear Leader, with all of the pomp and histrionics of a Kim family event, marks the third act in North Korea's 60-year tragedy. It is also a reminder that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) is a seriously funny place.

In the final days of Kim Jong Il's reign, I stood in a freezing cave in North Korea. My government guide pointed up at the stunning stalactites winding their way down from the cavern ceiling. He placed a hand on my shoulder and asked me a question I did not expect.

"Which one does yours look like?"

Dick jokes, it turns out, are huge in the DPRK. They are standard fare for the country's stand-up comedians, who from adolescence endure an intense training process -- think Flashdance, but with jokes -- to end up in one of Pyongyang's comedy clubs. Imagine that: being required to pursue the arts. In the Red-Confucianist spin on 1984 that is North Korea, even the laughs are planned. Orwell would have a field day.

Here's another paradox: the regime forbids alcohol in comedy clubs but encourages drinking at the shooting range. Welcome to public policy in North Korea.

These arcane contradictions, like Kim Jong Il's decadent rule over a nation that is infantilized, brutalized, and starving, are part of the DPRK way. When my guide invited me to shoot a live chicken over a round of North Korean beer, I declined the first and downed the second, unsure whether to enjoy the irony or despair over the 24 million people trapped in this totalitarian paradox writ large.

And yet North Koreans laugh -- a lot. They have a real sense of humor. Self-conscious and a bit immature, perhaps, but funny and endearing -- a celebration of the mundane and those human universals, including marriage, love, and the corresponding anatomy. Aside from food and drink, which were difficult to savor in a starving country, laughing was the one unadulterated joy I shared with locals. Humor has no borders.

But it does have boundaries. One local attempted a joke -- the first and only line was "George W. Bush," followed by a planned, awkward pause for laughter and a quick "thank you very much" -- but you will never hear a Kim Jong Il joke or a famine quip in North Korea. In the hermit kingdom, those aren't laughs; they're treason. An estimated 200,000 North Koreans are now in labor camps, many for crimes more innocent than a joke told in poor taste. While I laughed my way along the Youth Hero Highway, 50,000 people were fighting to survive in the concrete walls of Yodok Camp.

How can the rest of the country laugh, then? I asked another of my guides, a porcelain face in her 20s, to tell me her favorite joke.

"OK," she said, giggling. "There is a boy, and all day he is saying that he has to pee, so his mother tells him, 'It is rude to say you have to pee. If you have to pee, just say you have to whistle.'

"That night the boy wakes up because he has to pee. So he wakes up his father and he tells him, 'Father, Father, I have to whistle.'

"And the father says, 'OK, but do it quietly in my ear.'"

Two nights ago, I told a joke about Kim Jong Il during a show in Los Angeles. I got some laughs. But the joke about the whistling kid killed in Pyongyang.

How is that possible? Until two weeks ago a brutal dictator ruled the country. This capricious, nuclear, unstable man inherited a regime from his charismatic father, along with the most severe daddy issues in the dictator club. With a mix of brutal reign and shrewd negotiation, he created a state so laughably powerful, so aimlessly ambitious, that the democratic world had to accept the paradox and work with a nuclear dictator who wore heels to appear taller.

The line between policy and comedy blurred with the help of North Korea's propaganda machine. Official statements, riddled with supernatural hyperbole, read like a Sacha Baron Cohen script. The Pyongyang Times, a propagandist rag, could easily be mistaken for The Onion. You only need to read about Kim Jong Il's gastronomical obsessions or peruse the catalogue of 1,500 works he claims to have authored as a university student to realize that Kim Jong Il was the first dictator-clown in history.

Kim Jong Un, the baby-faced spawn of Jong Il, has assumed control of the DPRK as the "great successor to the revolutionary cause," a tired euphemism for a cruel experiment. He will likely continue the inhumane policies of a totalitarian system, relegating millions of his people to privation, fear, and a repertoire of dick jokes without a two-drink minimum.

Which is both hilarious and true. And if absurdity is a recognition of the truth, then an appreciation for the absurd would be a step forward in our approach to the regime. We must be honest in order to be effective. North Korea is genuinely funny. It is also unquestionably diabolical. Let's take a cue from Pasternak and call each thing by its right name, rather than deny the absurdity of a regime we hope to one day open up.

Thank you

professional web design

 

ABEERA

1:52 PM ET

March 6, 2012

good

As if war with Iraq- the daily, daylong images of fighting, and most recently, analysts’ accelerating (if predictable) talk of another Vietnam debacle- were not enough for our plates, allow me to heap some more on with these two words: North Korea.

Yes. That problem. It will still be there when we get back. And now, according to reports which have existed here in Japan but have largely gone unnoticed in the West, the North Korean problem appears to be even more lethal than originally thought.

For those who till now have somehow managed to tune out all the rumblings coming out of this region of the world, North Korea is the country in relatively prosperous northeast Asia where humanitarian groups estimate over 2,000,000 people have died from man-made famine. Even Doctors without Borders gave up on this country in 1998, dismayed by the dictatorship's mishandling of food aid from other countries(ie., appropriating it for the military and politically connected). *1

North Korea is also the country which in recent history has engaged in a well documented campaign of sabotage against South Korea, wreaking havoc and carnage with strikes such as, but hardly limited to, the October 1983 Rangoon bomb attack that killed several members of a South Korean presidential delegation to Myanmar, the two bombings in 1986 and 1987 of Kimpo International Airport as Seoul prepared to host the ’87 Asian Games and the ’88 Olympics, and of course the November 1987 bombing of Korean Airlines Flight 858, which was downed over the Bay of Bengal, killing all the 115 passengers and crew aboard. More on this incident shortly.

In the past half year, North Korea has unilaterally broken the 1994 Agreed Framework, withdrawn from the Non-Proliferation Treaty, been test firing missiles in the direction of Japan, and ramped up its production of nuclear weapons.
However, according to the Washington Post, "The (U.S.) administration has acquiesced in North Korea becoming a nuclear power" and "is turning its attention to preventing the Communist government in Pyongyang from selling nuclear material to the highest bidder." In that same article, Japanese ruling party parlimentarian Taro Kono states, "We need to be debating how to live with North Korea, with or without nuclear weapons."*2

At the end of the day, perhaps realistic conclusions, both. But, if we're going to try and "live with North Korea" while preventing it from "selling...material to the highest bidder", then there are some disturbing circumstances at which it is high time we all had a look.
One:
I remember holidaying Seoul just weeks after the bombing of KAL Flight 858. The city, the entire country, was riveted by the unfolding details of the story. Two North Korean agents posing as a Japanese couple, boarded the flight in Baghdad, planted their bomb in the overhead luggage compartment, then deplaned in Abu Dhabi. When caught in Bharain traveling with forged passports under the names "Shinichi and Mayumi Hachiya", they immediately tried to commit suicide by taking poison pills. The man succeeded; the woman failed. The latter was turned over to South Korean officials who brought her Seoul. There, "Mayumi Hachiya" confessing all before live television cameras, became a most celebrated femme fatale. Her real name was Kim Hyung Hee, she was 26 years old(and very pretty, drawing literally thousands of marraige proposals from single South Korean men), but most interesting to me at the time, was her revelation that she had been tutored in both Japanese language and mannerisms by a Japanese national, whom Kim knew only by the name of "Lee Un Hae". I learned then for the first time from the South Korean press about what had long been suspected, but would not be resolved yet for years to come: North Korea had been kidnapping innocent South Korean and Japanese citizens, spiriting them away to North Korea to exploit them as resources for their espionage, with most of these people never to be heard from again.
Over the years, revelations and speculation about these kidnapping/disappearances trickled in bit by bit. In 1991, the National Police Agency in Japan announced that it had identified a disappeared young Japanese woman as 'TY' (and now believed to be Yaeko Taguchi, disappeared in 1978) who most likely was the "Lee Un Hae" that tutored Miss Kim. A North Korean defector in 1993, and then again South Korean intelligence in 1997, provided clues about the most heart-wrenching story of the Japanese kidnap victims, a then thirteen year-old schoolgirl, Megumi Yokota, who vanished while walking home from school in 1977. Readers may recall Megumi's name, as only last month her still distraught parents came to Washington, pleading for U.S. help in satisfactorily resolving this issue. Last September, the North's President Kim Jong Il surprisingly confessed to his country's kidnapping of Japanese over the years. But in a sad and macabre twist, eight of the thirteen ‘acknowleged’ victims were said to now be dead. And although her parents have yet to accept it, one of the eight was Megumi Yokota.
Two
Also over the years, there had been some other puzzling occurrences in Japan with possible North Korean links. With North Korea's brinksmanship pushing its way to the forefront of the news, I decided once and for all that I wanted to look into these, and get them out of my system. Of the most eery, were rumors that the infamous Aum Shinrikyo Cult (they of the sarin gas attacks on the Tokyo subway system in 1995) had ties to North Korea.

To begin with, there were the interesting coincidences of gold bullion. After the gas attacks on the Tokyo subway, when police raided Aum's facilities in rural Japan's Yamanashi Prefecture, they found in the cult's possession a peculiar type of gold bullion: 10 unassayed gold bars. Gold is normally stamped with its weight, purity and assayer, in order for it to be sold or traded. This gold was completely unmarked, which would render it difficult to deal. But also, completely untraceable. Coincidence number one: the only other instance of such strange bullion in recent memory was when former Japanese ruling party king-maker, Shin Kanemaru, was indicted and later found guilty in a Japanese yakuza(mafia) related scandal in 1992. Identical unmarked gold bars were confiscated by police during raids on his office and home. Coincidence number two: Kanemaru's home constituency was Yamanashi Prefecture. Coincidence number three: The Washington Post reported in November of last year about a North Korean spy who defected to Japan and was scheduled to testify before the Japanese pariliament, when the ruling party, much to the protestations of opposition legislators, suddenly cancelled his testimony. It seems that what he had to say was too hot to handle. Of the things he told the Post he was planning to testify about, one was that Shin Kanemaru received "unmarked gold" for his secret brokering of a summit between Japan and North Korea in 1990.*4 Should this indeed explain what Kanemaru did to get his gold, what might Aum have done to get theirs? But first.....
There was the March 1995 assassination attempt on Japanese National Police Chief Takaji Kunimatsu. Kunimatsu had been spearheading the investigation into the cult. Shot four times outside his residence while leaving for work one morning, he did survive but his assailant has never been caught. Widely reported in the Japanese media at the time was that found at the scene of the crime were a North Korean military button and coin where the gunman had stood. (The question does beg to be asked, however, 'would an assassin from the North really bring along to a hit, his button and coin from said state?').....

This was then followed by the brazen, and successful, assassination of Hideo Murai. Murai was a central figure and chief scientist for Aum. He also was the person directly in charge of Aum's production of the deadly nerve gas sarin (remember this). On April 23, 1995, in full view of hordes of television cameras, reporters and several police officers, a 29 year-old man named Hiroyuki Jo stepped forward and repeatedly stabbed Murai with a kitchen knife. Then he struck a pose of bravado and bellowed for the TV cameras that were recording away until the police finally moved against him. Jo turned out to haved an underworld background. Also, he was an ethnic Korean....
Why, though, was Murai singled out to be assassinated? And did his killer's ethnicity have any particular significance? Jo gave to the police a succession stories, none which made much sense. The first, was that he was outraged by Aum's actions and simply wanted to kill a cultist –any cultist. But that didn't wash because during his daylong stalking of Murai outside of Aum's headquarters, several other Aum figures, both major and minor, passed by him throughout the day. His second story, the one that the police went with, was that the boss of the right-wing group he was affiliated with ordered him to carry out the hit. Some in the media went on to speculate that there were drug deals between Aum and the Japanese yakuza which Murai was privy to and therefore silenced. But to me, that explanation also defied logic. Jo's action –especially the manner in which he did it (down to the loud, easily identifiable yakuza garb he donned)– immediately, as well as predictably, put the theretofore off-the-radar yakuza, directly under the spotlight. There had to be better reason, and a different source, of the order to assasinate Aum Science Chief Murai....

In 1999, the United States Congress' House North Korea Advisory Group issued its "Congressional Report on North Korean Threat". Buried in the report were two sentences mentioning the North's capacity to deliver chemical weapons through "unconventional delivery means, e.g., clandestine aerosols and balloons". I personally remember -in 1996, I believe– the first reported case of several small, mysterious balloons landing in various locations in western and central Japan. It was not known whence the came and why they were sent, but the prevailing speculation was that they were sent by North Korea, possibly in a dry run of a chemical warfare attack against Japan. Try as I might, I could not find anything (that was credible) to footnote this recollection of mine. But I have been able to locate two press accounts of subsequent mysterious balloon sightings over Japan, one which includes a reference to the earlier event. I footnote them now. *4, 5 (And here is an 'internet' account of the original event, though this particular account might not do much to contribute to the credibility to my recollection.*6)
I had a lot of loose ends and questions, but nothing concrete. So I gathered up my notions of nefarious triangles and plots, and plunged into the Japanese language press. And got lucky.
Three
Unbeknownst to me, in 1999 a prominent Japanese investigative journalist by the name of Koji Takazawa had written an extensive report precisely on an Aum Shinrikyo/North Korean nexus. The report, entitled "Oum to Kita Chousen no Yami wo Toita (Aum and North Korea's Plot Unraveled)", was serialized over a four month period in the Japanese weekly magazine, Shukan Gendai, commencing with the August 21, 1999 issue and continuing through the November 6, issue of that same year. In 1998, Takazawa's book Shukumei: Yodogo B_meishatachi no Himitsu Kosaku (to be published soon in English as Destiny: The Secret Activities of the Yodogo Exiles) came out and would to go on to win the prestigious Kodansha Non-Fiction Prize. In Shukumei, Takazawa did groundbreaking work in revealing how a band of Japanese left wing radicals that in 1970 hijacked a Japanese airliner, the 'Yodo-go', and took it to North Korea for revolutionary training, were then compelled by the North Korean government to participate in the North's espionage operations over the next three decades. A noted writer and chronicler of Japan's New Left movement of the late 1960's and early 1970's, Takazawa traveled repeated over the years to Pyongyang, and actually met with and interviewed the Yodogo Group members. In particular, Shukumei is about the Yodogo Group's central role in many of the ensuing kidnappings of Japanese citizens to the North. Then, in the Shukan Gendai serialization, journalist Takazawa trained his focus on a new dimension: North Korea's cultivation of the Aum Shinrikyo Cult.

First some background. According to Dr. Patricia Steinhoff, University of Hawaii Professor of Sociology, and leading U.S. authority on Japanese society (also, translator of aforementioned English version of Shukumei), in addition to assigning the Yodogo Group to kidnapping Japanese nationals to North Korea, the North took the young left wingers' wild ambitions of leading a new-leftist revolution in Japan, and channeled them into the North's own equally wild designs. Namely, plans for carrying out acts of sabotage in Japan, leading a coup d'etat, and ultimately effecting a Kim Il Sung ‘Juche’-styled revolution in Japan. Says Dr. Steinhoff, "The North Koreans turned them (the Yodogos) from New Lefties into Chuche believers so they'd make the kind of revolution they wanted."

But in "Aum and North Korea's Plot Unraveled", Takazawa writes such Yodogo efforts were a general failure, culminating in the arrests of two of the Yodogo members who had infiltrated back into Japan under assumed names. He indicates that this was the North's impetus in then turning to Aum to carry out operations. Takazawa follows the paths of two key characters, both inner circle members of Aum who had the ear of cult leader Shoko Asahara, and reviews their deep and lengthy ties to North Korea. Both were originally members of the 'International Institute of Juche Ideology', a propaganda arm of the North based in Tokyo. The frequent travel of both to Pyongyang is documented, spanning a decade in one’s case, including his admissions in an interview of sojourns there of up to three months at a time and meetings with the intellectual architect of Juche Ideology, bigwig Hwang Jang Yop.

In addition to introducing us to these two Juche-cum-Aum followers, Takazawa does much to vindicate suspicions about Aum Science Minister Hideo Murai's assassin, Hiroyuki Jo. Jo consorted in circles that had known North Korean spies in their midst. His close friend and roommates's father was in the leadership of Chongryun, the stridently pro-North association of Koreans living in Japan (and often considered fifth column for the North). Jo himself received his education in Chongryun operated private schools. And finally, he turns out to have spent some of his young adulthood living in none other than North Korea. Just what he was doing there is not known.

As for Chief Scientist Murai, when the Japanese police's crackdown on Aum got into full swing, North Korea most certainly did have reason to silence him before he started singing. Here, Takazawa drops a bombshell. Apparently, on Murai's orders, an Aum follower obtained employment in the Japanese nuclear power industry. Once inside, that person got their hands on confidential nuclear data. And Murai forwarded the data to North Korea....

In a nutshell, the central thesis Takazawa drives at is: in their quest to carry out sabotage and even ultimately foment revolution in Japan, North Korea turned to Aum Shinrikyo, and is at least partly responsible for the cult's violent shift in the early 1990's.
But is there more?

I had not known about the transferring of nuclear data to North Korea when I first delved into this. My first hunches drew me to the sarin. Not that these two different trails need be exclusive of each other. Takazawa reports that Kim Il Sung wrote pointedly about the importance of using sarin as a weapon. And Aum arrived at using sarin, only after failing (sometimes through downright amateurish ineptitude) to kill people using VX gas, botulism, and phosgene gas. It has been well reported that Aum sought armaments and WMD technology from Russia.*7 Having difficulties with their various deadly gas efforts, why not also procure from North Korea, with whom they already a deepening relationship?

I was drawn to the sarin because of the Murai killing. And also, because I had another foggy recollection from years gone by. This one was about the foreign inspectors that visited the sight of Aum's sarin laboratory, 'Satian #7', and oversaw its demolition. I recalled that, at the time, the inspectors had stated something to the effect that, though the equipment there was expensive, it was not conceivable that sarin could have been produced in such seedy and dilapidated conditions. The internet is rife with the same recollection by others, but alas, I couldn't find anything in the mainstream media, English or Japanese, to support such claims.

So I went to the source. Both the inspections and supervision of the demolition of Satian #7 plant, was carried out by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), the official body entrusted by member states for implementing the Chemical Weapons Convention. (Its headquarters is in The Hague; its website is www.opcw.org). I contacted the 'Media and Public Affairs Branch' by email, and proceeded to have a lengthy back and forth with a amiable member of that office whom I shall refer to as 'Peter '(because that is his name).

I explained to Peter that I was doing a piece on Aum, gave him the gist of my questions about the Satian #7 plant and the rumors surrounding the OPCW inspectors, and asked him if he could contact said inspectors and confirm their actual assessment of the facility. Peter initially emailed me right back, writing "I will check the details and will update you as soon as possible." For exactly one work week, I cooled my heels, waiting for my promised "update". Finally, I inquired about my inquiry. An answer came back. I was told to have "patience". But Peter assured me, "I am curious too ... be of good cheer" (his elipses, not mine). Into the second week, I touched basis with Peter again. This time he wrote, "Progress is slow over here JT", but promised "By the end of the week, I will be able to come back to you with the decision." So now, what I had presumed was a promise to provide me with the inspectors assessment of the sarin plant, had been diminished to just a promise to 'decide' whether or not to release the information. Not that it mattered. Peter broke his promise to me that Friday. There was also no word from him the following Monday. Or Tuesday, the time of this writing. In all, over two weeks elapsed with me fruitlessly trying to chase Peter all around cyberspace. One knows when they are being stonewalled.

I wasn't told, "Our inspectors reported no such thing." I wasn't told, "We cannot release that kind of information." For some reason, I am simply, and continually, being stonewalled..........
Before going to the OPCW, I did recall, however, that there had been one individual, a Japanese journalist, who had been permitted access to the inside of Satian #7, just before its demolition. Her name is Shoko Egawa and she is a household name in Japan, appearing frequently on TV and writing about various societal topics. I prepared just three questions for her by email, with the the one I really wanted answered listed as number one. Namely, "Considering the rumors that Satian #7 was not a facility conducive to producing sarin, what was your impression upon actually seeing the facility for yourself?"
She was kind enough to respond, to my other two questions. But the Japanese characters in the text to my first one, which I wished most for her to answer, apparently kept getting corrupted and rendered illegible in the transmission. Now, once in a blue moon this actually can happen to the characters used in Japanese emails. But even after I carefully retyped out everything, and made doubly sure I was formatting the text properly before resending, her response came back again, "Can't read that question." She then tersely told me in effect to not email her anymore. Hmmmm........

Just to be certain, without altering anything, I forwarded the original text of my email to her to another email account I have with Yahoo. It arrived completely legible and intact. I then forwarded the first of the emails I sent to her, once again altering nothing. This too, arrived without a hitch.
People who know about the reality of the Satian #7 sarin plant, are not talking. Why is this?
Ms. Egawa, for one, perhaps has good reason to not want to deal with any reopened Aum controversies. She survived an attack on her life made by Aum in 1994 following one of her reports on the cult.
FOUR
At this point, it is tempting to jump to conclusions by stringing together the all of the above, aforementioned circumstances. The fact is, in trying to chase down this story, I've actually ended up creating more questions than with which I started. But in the end, the story may turn out to just not have legs.
Also, on a separate point, though I hardly delved in to it in this article, the Japanese investigative authorities, Foreign Ministry, and political leaders have much to answer for in their highly suspect handling of all of the above cases.
But I have done all that I can as an amateur reporter; it is now time for the big boys of the media to take over. May the questions fly. And may they begin with:
A) Has North Korea already done it? Have they, in fact, provided terrorists (Aum) with weapons of mass destruction such as sarin?
B) Just what else might authorities in Japan know about North Korea, that is not known by the U.S. and the rest of the world?

great blog post. i like it a lot.
propaclean is the best cleaning services in london and we have been providing our services
from many years.we are providing our service in residential and commercial properties
of London and other places of London. If you need any cleaning services work then feel
free to contact us at Tel: 0845 634 1101 or AFTER office HOURS: 07950 743 855

Thank You

cleaning services london

 

MAXIMB

1:05 PM ET

March 19, 2012

I don't think he has very

I don't think he has very good people around him. Today he didn't even say anything & looked foolish. His idea to compete with Obama by going to a german restaurant just brought more attention to how badly he pales in comparison. So ever when he is stuffing his mouth with sugar he is looking foolish...Fri. he will be with the dalai lama & I know many people who love the dalai lama who appalled by the actions of a warmonger so this is already feeling so uncomfortable. I know there might be a crowd there but it won't be to see McCain..

"Is rio orange war always comparateur forfait mobile inevitable ?"
MaximB

 

MAXIMB

8:24 AM ET

March 22, 2012

why do we vote on people

why do we vote on people anyways in this country...we always seem to get bad choices. its like modern day feudalism where only the people of wealthy families have a shot at winning regardless of their abilities. i am definately a proponent of the parliament system where you vote on the party..

"Is rio orange war always forfait b and you inevitable ?"
MaximB

 

MAXIMB

10:29 PM ET

March 22, 2012

His biggest challenge will be

His biggest challenge will be where to come up with the cash that all his supporters are standing outside by their mailboxes waiting for!!!......LMFAO.

"Is rio orange war always forfait mobile" inevitable ?"
MaximB

 

This blog does not have any specific about information tied to it.

Read More